Find Out If You Are Eligible
If you feel that Google may have infringed on your privacy while using Incognito Mode, you can take our online quiz to see if you qualify to file a lawsuit.
Google’s Gemini AI tool, a critical part of its strategy to compete in the fast-evolving artificial intelligence landscape, has faced multiple legal challenges in recent months. While there isn’t a Google Gemini lawsuit on the consumer level, some legal developments could lead to future lawsuits.
The legal issues with Google Gemini primarily revolve around the unauthorized use of copyrighted content. Additionally, technical failures have led to racially insensitive imagery, which has damaged the AI tool’s reputation. This lawsuit and other controversies have raised significant concerns over the company’s handling of user data, privacy, intellectual property, and transparency.
In March 2024, Google was hit with a massive €250 million ($271 million) fine by French regulators due to a breach of copyright laws. The fine came after the French competition authority determined that Google’s Gemini AI tool had improperly used data from news publishers to train the AI model. The tool, which scours and processes vast amounts of online data to generate outputs as summaries and analyses, was found to have incorporated protected content without obtaining proper licenses or providing compensation to the original creators.
The €250 million fine serves as a major warning to tech companies about the risks of relying on AI tools that exploit large-scale datasets.
This case mirrors ongoing legal scrutiny surrounding Google’s practices, most notably the Google Incognito Mode lawsuit. In that lawsuit, Google is accused of misleading users by falsely assuring them that their activity would be private while using Incognito Mode.
Take the quiz to see if you qualify to file an Incognito mode lawsuit.
Both cases highlight a common theme: Google’s apparent failure to fully disclose how it collects and uses data—whether that’s user information or copyrighted content.
In addition to legal battles over copyright issues, Google also faced a significant internal crisis when Gemini’s image generation tool malfunctioned earlier in 2024. The company temporarily removed the tool after numerous users complained about inappropriate content. Google’s CEO Sundar Pichai labeled the blunder “unacceptable,” marking a rare admission of error from the company.
This incident underscores a pattern seen in Google’s broader operations, particularly in handling intellectual property. The malfunction of Gemini’s image generation tool has revealed weaknesses in Google’s handling of content and data security.
Google is criticized for launching powerful tools and features without ensuring they align with ethical and legal standards, leaving both users and creators vulnerable to exploitation.
Despite these setbacks, Google recently reintroduced the Gemini AI image generator, with revisions to avoid further malfunctions. The relaunch shows that while Google remains committed to the success of Gemini, it must now navigate a legal minefield filled with potential pitfalls in areas like intellectual property law and ethical AI use.
Moving forward, it’s clear that Google must adopt stronger compliance mechanisms and more transparent communication about its AI tools. As the company continues to face legal challenges like the Gemini lawsuit, investors and the public will watch closely to see if Google can strike the right balance between innovation and accountability.
The Google Gemini lawsuit underscores the challenges tech giants face as they develop and deploy AI tools while navigating complex legal frameworks. From copyright breaches that resulted in a hefty fine in France to technical malfunctions that led to the temporary removal of key features, Gemini’s rocky start has raised questions about how Google handles intellectual property.
As AI continues to reshape the digital landscape, these legal controversies serve as a crucial reminder that even the most advanced technologies must comply with ethical and legal standards.